MemoQ 9.8 says: "New version available MemoQ 9.12"? Bug or mathematically challenged developer? Thread poster: Adieu
| Adieu Ukrainian to English + ...
Any ideas? Also, if it actually is new, is it better? | | | | What's the problem? | Sep 6, 2022 |
Yes, the most recent version is 9.12.9. What's wrong with or strange about that? Each new version usually has new features, which you can look up in the release notes online. | | | Samuel Murray Netherlands Local time: 16:32 Member (2006) English to Afrikaans + ...
12 comes after 8. What's the problem? I can't find a page for 9.11, but perhaps not all versions are released to the public, or warrant a separate page on the website.
[Edited at 2022-09-06 18:09 GMT] | |
|
|
Adieu Ukrainian to English + ... TOPIC STARTER
Samuel Murray wrote: 12 comes after 8. What's the problem? I can't find a page for 9.11, but perhaps not all versions are released to the public, or warrant a separate page on the website.
[Edited at 2022-09-06 18:09 GMT] That's not how decimals work. 9.8 is a larger number than 9.12. I guess they retroactively decided that 9.8 was actually 9.08? | | | 9.10.10 was pulled | Sep 6, 2022 |
Samuel Murray wrote: 12 comes after 8. What's the problem? I can't find a page for 9.11 9.10.10 was pulled because it couldn't write Trados return packages, a serious bug. Maybe that explains the absence of 9.11. But I don't see why a user should worry about a gap in the numbering, and if anyone is challenged, I don't think they work for memoQ. | | |
Adieu wrote: Samuel Murray wrote: 12 comes after 8. What's the problem? I can't find a page for 9.11, but perhaps not all versions are released to the public, or warrant a separate page on the website.
[Edited at 2022-09-06 18:09 GMT] That's not how decimals work. 9.8 is a larger number than 9.12. I guess they retroactively decided that 9.8 was actually 9.08? No, decimals don't work like that, but most versioning today doesn't use decimal numbers: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning#Semantic_versioning The dot is a separator, not a decimal point. | | | Stepan Konev Russian Federation Local time: 17:32 English to Russian Who cares. Efficiency counts | Sep 6, 2022 |
When I process a photo, I have one bluesky_before.jpg file and a dozen of target files like bluesky_after.0.jpg, bluesky_after.1.jpg, bluesky_after.1-1.jpg, bluesky_after.1-1-1.jpg, bluesky_after.2.jpg, bluesky_after.2-1.jpg, bluesky_after.2-2.jpg, bluesky_after.2-2-1.jpg, bluesky_after.final.jpg, bluesky_after.final-0.jpg, bluesky_after.final-1.jpg, bluesky_after.final-1-1.jpg, bluesky_after.final-2-1.jpg, bluesky_after.last-final.jpg... Those numbers are not decimals, they stand f... See more When I process a photo, I have one bluesky_before.jpg file and a dozen of target files like bluesky_after.0.jpg, bluesky_after.1.jpg, bluesky_after.1-1.jpg, bluesky_after.1-1-1.jpg, bluesky_after.2.jpg, bluesky_after.2-1.jpg, bluesky_after.2-2.jpg, bluesky_after.2-2-1.jpg, bluesky_after.final.jpg, bluesky_after.final-0.jpg, bluesky_after.final-1.jpg, bluesky_after.final-1-1.jpg, bluesky_after.final-2-1.jpg, bluesky_after.last-final.jpg... Those numbers are not decimals, they stand for iterations. ▲ Collapse | |
|
|
Geof Aberhart Taiwan Local time: 22:32 Member (2015) Chinese to English Fortune tellers would make better money elsewhere | Sep 14, 2022 |
Adieu wrote: That's not how decimals work. 9.8 is a larger number than 9.12. I guess they retroactively decided that 9.8 was actually 9.08? Were they supposed to know ahead of time how many versions there'd be and pad it out with the appropriate number of zeroes in advance?
[Edited at 2022-09-14 04:55 GMT] | | |
[Edited at 2022-09-29 17:42 GMT] | | | Version numbers are not decimal numbers | Sep 30, 2022 |
Version numbers are not decimal numbers but "multi-part" numbers. The first number denotes the major version, the second denotes the minor version, the third denotes the build. So, version 9.12.9 is major version 9, minor version 12, build 9. Each part of a version number progresses according to a set of rules, which is not always followed. For example, a software company may choose to bump up the major version number just to justify a new release and a new flow of income.
[E... See more Version numbers are not decimal numbers but "multi-part" numbers. The first number denotes the major version, the second denotes the minor version, the third denotes the build. So, version 9.12.9 is major version 9, minor version 12, build 9. Each part of a version number progresses according to a set of rules, which is not always followed. For example, a software company may choose to bump up the major version number just to justify a new release and a new flow of income.
[Edited at 2022-09-30 08:44 GMT] ▲ Collapse | | | To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request » MemoQ 9.8 says: "New version available MemoQ 9.12"? Bug or mathematically challenged developer? Protemos translation business management system | Create your account in minutes, and start working! 3-month trial for agencies, and free for freelancers!
The system lets you keep client/vendor database, with contacts and rates, manage projects and assign jobs to vendors, issue invoices, track payments, store and manage project files, generate business reports on turnover profit per client/manager etc.
More info » |
| CafeTran Espresso | You've never met a CAT tool this clever!
Translate faster & easier, using a sophisticated CAT tool built by a translator / developer.
Accept jobs from clients who use Trados, MemoQ, Wordfast & major CAT tools.
Download and start using CafeTran Espresso -- for free
Buy now! » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |